Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls? | Date | Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:27:08 +0000 |
| |
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW only applies to the last pathname component anyway, > > so it's relatively little protection. > > So this is partially why I think it's at least worth considerings: the > new RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS flag does block all symlink resolution, not just > for the last component in contrast to AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. This is > 278121417a72d87fb29dd8c48801f80821e8f75a
That sounds like a potentially significant UAPI change. What will that break?
David
| |