Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:20:43 +0100 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] perf test: Test pmu-events aliases |
| |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:02:19PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
SNIP
> struct perf_pmu_test_event { > struct pmu_event event; > + > + /* extra events for aliases */ > + const char *alias_str; > + > + /* > + * Note: For when PublicDescription does not exist in the JSON, we > + * will have no long_desc in pmu_event.long_desc, but long_desc may > + * be set in the alias. > + */ > + const char *alias_long_desc; > }; > + > static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = { > { > .event = { > @@ -20,6 +31,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = { > .desc = "L1 BTB Correction", > .topic = "branch", > }, > + .alias_str = "event=0x8a", > + .alias_long_desc = "L1 BTB Correction", > }, > { > .event = { > @@ -28,6 +41,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = { > .desc = "L2 BTB Correction", > .topic = "branch", > }, > + .alias_str = "event=0x8b", > + .alias_long_desc = "L2 BTB Correction", > }, > { > .event = { > @@ -36,6 +51,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = { > .desc = "Number of segment register loads", > .topic = "other", > }, > + .alias_str = "umask=0x80,(null)=0x30d40,event=0x6",
ah so we are using other pmus because of the format definitions
why is there the '(null)' in there?
jirka
| |