Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 7 Feb 2020 22:17:28 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: [for-next][PATCH 04/26] bootconfig: Add Extra Boot Config support |
| |
Hi Geert,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:49:02 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Hiramatsu-san, > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:30 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:20:15 +0100 > > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:42 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:54:05 +0100 > > > > Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:03:20PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig > > > > > > index a34064a031a5..63450d3bbf12 100644 > > > > > > --- a/init/Kconfig > > > > > > +++ b/init/Kconfig > > > > > > @@ -1215,6 +1215,17 @@ source "usr/Kconfig" > > > > > > > > > > > > endif > > > > > > > > > > > > +config BOOT_CONFIG > > > > > > + bool "Boot config support" > > > > > > + select LIBXBC > > > > > > + default y > > > > > > > > > > Any particular reason this is default y? Why should it be enabled by > > > > > default on all boxes? > > > > > > > > Oh, you are not the first person asked that :) > > > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/9/563 > > > > > > > > And yes, I think this is important that will useful for most developers > > > > and admins. Since the bootconfig already covers kernel and init options, > > > > this can be a new standard way to pass args to kernel boot. > > > > > > > > And as I reported above thread, the memory footpoint of view, most code > > > > and working memory are released after boot. Also, as Linus's suggested, > > > > now this feature is enabled only if user gives "bootconfig" on the kernel > > > > command line. So the side effect is minimized. > > > > > > With m68k/atari_defconfig, bloat-o-meter says: > > > > > > add/remove: 39/0 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 13086/0 (13086) > > > > > > which is IMHO not that small for a "default y" option that may or may not > > > be used. > > > > > > Especially: > > > > > > Function old new delta > > > xbc_nodes - 8192 +8192 > > > > > > Any chance xbc_nodes can be allocated dynamically, and only when needed? > > > > Yes, I think we can use memblock to allocate it. However, this xbc_nodes is > > Good. > > > __init_data, which is released right after boot. So I think it should be > > OK except for your system doesn't have user space... > > __initdata is still part of the kernel image (note that we no longer > have __initbss) and consumes RAM early on, and is thus subject to e.g. > bootloader[1] and platform limitations (e.g. the kernel must fit in the > first block of physical memory). > So trying to avoid large static arrays is useful.
OK, I'll replace it with memblock. Then it will be 5 - 6KB in total.
Thank you!
-- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |