Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:31:16 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (sound/soc/codecs/wm5110.c) |
| |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09:59AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 1) We could update the machine drivers to do an imply as well, > like the changes to SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS. I think this will > generally work but doesn't really feel right as you can end up with > the machine driver built without the CODEC.
Yes, that's not helpful.
> 2) We could update the machine drivers to a depends on and make > the CODEC symbols manually selectable. I guess this also has the > advantages that it would be necessary for the simple card stuff > that seems to be everyones first choice for machine drivers these > days.
That's not good, it means people have to know exactly what CODECs and DAIs are on their board to even see the config option.
> Mark do you have any strong feelings on this I am leaning towards > 2?
Why not just continue adding the relevant dependencies to the machine drivers like we've always done? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |