lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] skbuff: fix a data race in skb_queue_len()
On 2/17/20, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> - list->qlen--;
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(list->qlen, list->qlen - 1);
>>
>> Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here, but this immediately jumped out.
>> This generates worse code with a bigger race in some sense:
>>
>> list->qlen-- is:
>>
>> 0: 83 6f 10 01 subl $0x1,0x10(%rdi)
>>
>> whereas WRITE_ONCE(list->qlen, list->qlen - 1) is:
>>
>> 0: 8b 47 10 mov 0x10(%rdi),%eax
>> 3: 83 e8 01 sub $0x1,%eax
>> 6: 89 47 10 mov %eax,0x10(%rdi)
>>
>> Are you sure that's what we want?
>
> Fixing these KCSAN warnings is actively making the kernel worse.
>
> Why are we still doing this?
>
Not necessarily a big fan of this either, but just for the record here
in case it helps, while you might complain about instruction size
blowing up a bit, cycle-wise these wind up being about the same
anyway. On x86, one instruction != one cycle.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-17 08:40    [W:0.147 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site