Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9063: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member | From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <> | Date | Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:29:06 -0600 |
| |
On 2/12/20 05:14, Adam Thomson wrote: > On 11 February 2020 23:47, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > >> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language >> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare >> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], >> introduced in C99: >> >> struct foo { >> int stuff; >> struct boo array[]; >> }; >> >> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning >> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which >> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being >> inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. >> >> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. >> >> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html >> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 >> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") >> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> >> --- >> drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9063- >> regulator.c >> index 2b0c7a85306a..368f8ad2a9f9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c >> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c >> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct da9063_regulator { >> struct da9063_regulators { >> unsigned n_regulators; >> /* Array size to be defined during init. Keep at end. */ >> - struct da9063_regulator regulator[0]; >> + struct da9063_regulator regulator[]; > > Same comment as for da9062. The probe uses malloc and does not statically > initialise for this struct so this will break the probe. >
Dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
Thanks -- Gustavo
| |