Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control | From | Weiyi Lu <> | Date | Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:56:01 +0800 |
| |
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 18:04 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 20/12/2019 04:46, Weiyi Lu wrote: > > For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to > > do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram. > > We add a flag "sram_iso_ctrl" in scp_domain_data to judge if we > > need to do the extra sram isolation control or not. > > > > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> > > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > index 32be4b3..1972726 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ > > #define PWR_ON_BIT BIT(2) > > #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT BIT(3) > > #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT BIT(4) > > +#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT BIT(5) > > +#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT BIT(6) > > > > #define PWR_STATUS_CONN BIT(1) > > #define PWR_STATUS_DISP BIT(3) > > @@ -86,6 +88,8 @@ > > * @name: The domain name. > > * @sta_mask: The mask for power on/off status bit. > > * @ctl_offs: The offset for main power control register. > > + * @sram_iso_ctrl: The flag to judge if the power domain need to do > > + * the extra sram isolation control. > > * @sram_pdn_bits: The mask for sram power control bits. > > * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits. > > * @basic_clk_name: The basic clocks required by this power domain. > > @@ -98,6 +102,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data { > > const char *name; > > u32 sta_mask; > > int ctl_offs; > > + bool sram_iso_ctrl; > > Why don't we put that into the caps variable? We have plenty of space left there > and if needed we can bump up its value from u8 to u32. >
Thanks for reminding, I'll put into caps in next version.
> > u32 sram_pdn_bits; > > u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS]; > > @@ -233,6 +238,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > > return ret; > > } > > > > + if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl) { > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + udelay(1); > > + val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -242,8 +255,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > > u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > int tmp; > > > > - val = readl(ctl_addr); > > - val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > + if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl) { > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + udelay(1); > > Why do we need to wait here? >
It's the restriction of sram isolation for both enable and disable stage and we've confirmed 1us is safe.
> > + } > > + > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > > > /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
| |