lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible
    From
    Date
    On 12/8/20 4:12 AM, David Laight wrote:
    > From: Waiman Long
    >> Sent: 07 December 2020 19:02
    > ...
    >>> How much more difficult would it be to also add a timeout option?
    >>> I looked at adding one to the mutex code - and fell into a big pile
    >>> of replicated code.
    >>>
    >>> ISTM that one the initial locked exchange (and spin) fails a few
    >>> extra instructions when heading for the sleep don't really matter
    >>>
    >> Actually, I had tried that before. See
    >>
    >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190911150537.19527-1-longman@redhat.com/
    >>
    >> That is for rwsem, but the same can be done for mutex. However, Peter
    >> didn't seem to like the idea of a timeout parameter. Anyway, it is
    >> certainly doable if there is a good use case for it.
    > 'Unfortunately' my use-case if for an out-of-tree driver.
    >
    > The problem I was solving is a status call blocking because
    > some other code is 'stuck' (probably an oops) with a mutex held.
    >
    > The code used to use down_timeout() (it was written for 2.4).
    > When I changed to mutex_(to get optimistic spinning) I lost
    > the ability to do the timeouts.

    The primary reason for sending out that patchset was to work around some
    circular locking problem in existing code even though these circular
    locking scenarios are not likely to happen. Your case is certainly
    another potential circular locking problem as well.

    Cheers,
    Longman


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-12-08 16:39    [W:2.403 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site