lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/filemap: add static for function __add_to_page_cache_locked
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:18:57AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/11/11 上午3:50, Andrew Morton 写道:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:39:24 +0530 Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 4:55 PM Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise it cause gcc warning:
> >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ../mm/filemap.c:830:14: warning: no previous prototype for
> >>> ‘__add_to_page_cache_locked’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >>> noinline int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
> >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Is CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF enabled in your .config ?
> >
> > hm, yes.
>
> When the config enabled, compiling looks good untill pahole tool
> used to get BTF info, but I still failed on a right version pahole
> > 1.16. Sorry.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> >>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>> ---
> >>> mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> >>> index d90614f501da..249cf489f5df 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> >>> @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ int replace_page_cache_page(struct page *old, struct page *new, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >>> }
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(replace_page_cache_page);
> >>>
> >>> -noinline int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
> >>> +static noinline int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
> >>> struct address_space *mapping,
> >>> pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp,
> >>> void **shadowp)
> >
> > It's unclear to me whether BTF_ID() requires that the target symbol be
> > non-static. It doesn't actually reference the symbol:
> >
> > #define BTF_ID(prefix, name) \
> > __BTF_ID(__ID(__BTF_ID__##prefix##__##name##__))
> >
>
> The above usage make me thought BTF don't require the symbol, though
> the symbol still exist in vmlinux with 'static'.
>
> So any comments of this, Alexei?

It's probably more complicated: our v5.10-rc7 builds with
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y fail on ppc64 and ppc64le with

BTFIDS vmlinux
FAILED unresolved symbol __add_to_page_cache_locked


but succeed on x86_64, i586, aarch64 and s390x. So far I don't see why
this should depend on architecture.

Michal

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-07 09:18    [W:0.090 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site