lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > > > by DT project.
> > > >
> > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>
> > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Thanks, applied.
> >
> > Sorry, what?
> >
> > Applied to what tree?
>
> I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it
> is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Anyway, patch still looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Thanks Pavel.

I plan on taking this next week.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-31 13:20    [W:0.061 / U:2.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site