lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] overlayfs: Report writeback errors on upper
From
Date
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 18:20 +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:50:55PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Currently syncfs() and fsync() seem to be two interfaces which check and
> > return writeback errors on superblock to user space. fsync() should
> > work fine with overlayfs as it relies on underlying filesystem to
> > do the check and return error. For example, if ext4 is on upper filesystem,
> > then ext4_sync_file() calls file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file) on
> > upper file and returns error. So overlayfs does not have to do anything
> > special.
> >
> > But with syncfs(), error check happens in vfs in syncfs() w.r.t
> > overlay_sb->s_wb_err. Given overlayfs is stacked filesystem, it
> > does not do actual writeback and all writeback errors are recorded
> > on underlying filesystem. So sb->s_wb_err is never updated hence
> > syncfs() does not work with overlay.
> >
> > Jeff suggested that instead of trying to propagate errors to overlay
> > super block, why not simply check for errors against upper filesystem
> > super block. I implemented this idea.
> >
> > Overlay file has "since" value which needs to be initialized at open
> > time. Overlay overrides VFS initialization and re-initializes
> > f->f_sb_err w.r.t upper super block. Later when
> > ovl_sb->errseq_check_advance() is called, f->f_sb_err is used as
> > since value to figure out if any error on upper sb has happened since
> > then.
> >
> > Note, Right now this patch only deals with regular file and directories.
> > Yet to deal with special files like device inodes, socket, fifo etc.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/overlayfs/file.c | 1 +
> >  fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 1 +
> >  fs/overlayfs/readdir.c | 1 +
> >  fs/overlayfs/super.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/overlayfs/util.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > index efccb7c1f9bc..7b58a44dcb71 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static int ovl_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >   return PTR_ERR(realfile);
> >  
> >
> >   file->private_data = realfile;
> > + ovl_init_file_errseq(file);
> >  
> >
> >   return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> > index f8880aa2ba0e..47838abbfb3d 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int ovl_check_metacopy_xattr(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *dentry);
> >  bool ovl_is_metacopy_dentry(struct dentry *dentry);
> >  char *ovl_get_redirect_xattr(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *dentry,
> >   int padding);
> > +void ovl_init_file_errseq(struct file *file);
> >  
> >
> >  static inline bool ovl_is_impuredir(struct super_block *sb,
> >   struct dentry *dentry)
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> > index 01620ebae1bd..0c48f1545483 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> > @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ static int ovl_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >   od->is_real = ovl_dir_is_real(file->f_path.dentry);
> >   od->is_upper = OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type);
> >   file->private_data = od;
> > + ovl_init_file_errseq(file);
> >  
> >
> >   return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > index 290983bcfbb3..d99867983722 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > @@ -390,6 +390,28 @@ static int ovl_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> >   return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >
> > +static int ovl_errseq_check_advance(struct super_block *sb, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct ovl_fs *ofs = sb->s_fs_info;
> > + struct super_block *upper_sb;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!ovl_upper_mnt(ofs))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + upper_sb = ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_sb;
> > +
> > + if (!errseq_check(&upper_sb->s_wb_err, file->f_sb_err))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Something changed, must use slow path */
> > + spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
> > + ret = errseq_check_and_advance(&upper_sb->s_wb_err, &file->f_sb_err);
> > + spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct super_operations ovl_super_operations = {
> >   .alloc_inode = ovl_alloc_inode,
> >   .free_inode = ovl_free_inode,
> > @@ -400,6 +422,7 @@ static const struct super_operations ovl_super_operations = {
> >   .statfs = ovl_statfs,
> >   .show_options = ovl_show_options,
> >   .remount_fs = ovl_remount,
> > + .errseq_check_advance = ovl_errseq_check_advance,
> >  };
> >  
> >
> >  enum {
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/util.c b/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> > index 23f475627d07..a1742847f3a8 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> > @@ -950,3 +950,16 @@ char *ovl_get_redirect_xattr(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *dentry,
> >   kfree(buf);
> >   return ERR_PTR(res);
> >  }
> > +
> > +void ovl_init_file_errseq(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct super_block *sb = file_dentry(file)->d_sb;
> > + struct ovl_fs *ofs = sb->s_fs_info;
> > + struct super_block *upper_sb;
> > +
> > + if (!ovl_upper_mnt(ofs))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + upper_sb = ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_sb;
> > + file->f_sb_err = errseq_sample(&upper_sb->s_wb_err);
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.25.4
> >
>
> I fail to see why this is neccessary if you incorporate error reporting into the
> sync_fs callback. Why is this separate from that callback? If you pickup Jeff's
> patch that adds the 2nd flag to errseq for "observed", you should be able to
> stash the first errseq seen in the ovl_fs struct, and do the check-and-return
> in there instead instead of adding this new infrastructure.
>
> IMHO, if we're going to fix this, sync_fs should be replaced, and there should
> be a generic_sync_fs wrapper which does the errseq, callback, and sync blockdev,
> but then filesystems should be able to override it and do the requisite work.

The big problem is that ->sync_fs is called in several different
contexts. For syncfs(), yes, but also for sync(), some quota handling,
etc.

In most of those, we don't want to do an errseq_check_and_advance
because we don't have a way to send that error back to userland at all
(e.g., sync()), or reporting a writeback error might not make sense.
(e.g. quotactl()).

IOW, we need to be able to distinguish the context in which the sync_fs
is being performed before "scraping" the error.
Cheers,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-23 20:02    [W:0.113 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site