lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] intel/iwlwifi: use DEFINE_MUTEX (and mutex_init() had been too late)
From
Date
On 23.12.2020 15:11, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> index 9dcd2e990c9c..71119044382f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ enum {
> };
>
> /* Protects the table contents, i.e. the ops pointer & drv list */
> -static struct mutex iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx);
> static struct iwlwifi_opmode_table {
> const char *name; /* name: iwldvm, iwlmvm, etc */
> const struct iwl_op_mode_ops *ops; /* pointer to op_mode ops */
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,6 @@ static int __init iwl_drv_init(void)
> {
> int i, err;
>
> - mutex_init(&iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iwlwifi_opmode_table); i++)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iwlwifi_opmode_table[i].drv);
>
>
The change itself is ok, but:
- commit message is missing (did you run checkpatch?)
- Why should the current mutex_init() call be too late?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-23 16:05    [W:0.027 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site