Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] badblocks: Improvement badblocks_set() for handling multiple ranges | From | antlists <> | Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:12:14 +0000 |
| |
On 20/12/2020 09:46, Coly Li wrote: > Currently blocks/badblocks.c is used by md raid and nvdimm code, and the > badblocks table is irrelevant to any of these two subsystems.
Good to know. > > If there will be better code for similar or better functionality, it > should be cool. For me, if the reporting bug is fixed, no difference in > my view:-) > Hopefully that will improve the badblocks handling in md. Sounds like that could in part be the problems we've been seeing.
If I integrate dm-integrity into md, badblocks should be mutually exclusive with it, but because dm-integrity is both a performance and disk-space hit, people might well not want to enable it.
Cheers, Wol
| |