lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] x86/resctrl: Update PQR_ASSOC MSR synchronously when moving task to resource group
Date

On 14/12/20 18:41, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> - return ret;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * By now, the task's closid and rmid are set. If the task is current
>>> + * on a CPU, the PQR_ASSOC MSR needs to be updated to make the resource
>>> + * group go into effect. If the task is not current, the MSR will be
>>> + * updated when the task is scheduled in.
>>> + */
>>> + update_task_closid_rmid(tsk);
>>
>> We need the above writes to be compile-ordered before the IPI is sent.
>> There *is* a preempt_disable() down in smp_call_function_single() that
>> gives us the required barrier(), can we deem that sufficient or would we
>> want one before update_task_closid_rmid() for the sake of clarity?
>>
>
> Apologies, it is not clear to me why the preempt_disable() would be
> insufficient. If it is not then there may be a few other areas (where
> resctrl calls smp_call_function_xxx()) that needs to be re-evaluated.

So that's part paranoia and part nonsense from my end - the contents of
smp_call() shouldn't matter here.

If we distill the code to:

tsk->closid = x;

if (task_curr(tsk))
smp_call(...);

It is somewhat far fetched, but AFAICT this can be compiled as:

if (task_curr(tsk))
tsk->closid = x;
smp_call(...);
else
tsk->closid = x;

IOW, there could be a sequence where the closid write is ordered *after*
the task_curr() read. With

tsk->closid = x;

barrier();

if (task_curr(tsk))
smp_call(...);

that explicitely cannot happen.

>
> Thank you very much
>
> Reinette

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-16 18:43    [W:0.082 / U:0.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site