lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [v2 PATCH 3/9] mm: vmscan: guarantee shrinker_slab_memcg() sees valid shrinker_maps for online memcg
Date
15.12.2020, 15:40, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:37:16PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>  The shrink_slab_memcg() races with mem_cgroup_css_online(). A visibility of CSS_ONLINE flag
>>  in shrink_slab_memcg()->mem_cgroup_online() does not guarantee that we will see
>>  memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_maps != NULL. This may occur because of processor reordering
>>  on !x86.
>>
>>  This seems like the below case:
>>
>>             CPU A CPU B
>>  store shrinker_map load CSS_ONLINE
>>  store CSS_ONLINE load shrinker_map
>>
>>  So the memory ordering could be guaranteed by smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() pair.
>>
>>  The memory barriers pair will guarantee the ordering between shrinker_deferred and CSS_ONLINE
>>  for the following patches as well.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
>
> As per previous feedback, please move the misplaced shrinker
> allocation callback from .css_online to .css_alloc. This will get you
> the necessary ordering guarantees from the cgroup core code.


Can you read my emails from ktkhai@virtuozzo.com? I've already answered
on this question here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/10/726

Check your spam folder, and add my address to allow-list if so.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-15 14:09    [W:0.065 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site