lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] PCI/ASPM: Use the path max in L1 ASPM latency check
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:09:12PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:40 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:56:31PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:19 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > If you're interested, you could probably unload the Realtek drivers,
> > > > remove the devices, and set the PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LD (Link Disable) bit
> > > > in 02:04.0, e.g.,
> > > >
> > > > # RT=/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.2/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:04.0
> > > > # echo 1 > $RT/0000:04:00.0/remove
> > > > # echo 1 > $RT/0000:04:00.1/remove
> > > > # echo 1 > $RT/0000:04:00.2/remove
> > > > # echo 1 > $RT/0000:04:00.4/remove
> > > > # echo 1 > $RT/0000:04:00.7/remove
> > > > # setpci -s02:04.0 CAP_EXP+0x10.w=0x0010
> > > >
> > > > That should take 04:00.x out of the picture.
> > >
> > > Didn't actually change the behaviour, I'm suspecting an errata for AMD pcie...
> > >
> > > So did this, with unpatched kernel:
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
> > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.56 MBytes 38.2 Mbits/sec 0 67.9 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.47 MBytes 37.5 Mbits/sec 0 96.2 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.85 MBytes 40.7 Mbits/sec 0 50.9 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 70.7 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 48.1 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 45.2 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 36.8 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 3.98 MBytes 33.4 Mbits/sec 0 36.8 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 36.8 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.23 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 0 48.1 KBytes
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 43.2 MBytes 36.2 Mbits/sec 0 sender
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 42.7 MBytes 35.8 Mbits/sec receiver
> > >
> > > and:
> > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.2/0000:01:00.0/link/l1_aspm
> >
> > BTW, thanks a lot for testing out the "l1_aspm" sysfs file. I'm very
> > pleased that it seems to be working as intended.
>
> It was nice to find it for easy disabling :)
>
> > > and:
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
> > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 113 MBytes 951 Mbits/sec 153 772 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 109 MBytes 912 Mbits/sec 276 550 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec 123 625 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec 31 687 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 0 679 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 136 577 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 214 645 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 32 628 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 81 537 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 110 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec 10 577 KBytes
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.08 GBytes 927 Mbits/sec 1056 sender
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 923 Mbits/sec receiver
> > >
> > > But this only confirms that the fix i experience is a side effect.
> > >
> > > The original code is still wrong :)
> >
> > What exactly is this machine? Brand, model, config? Maybe you could
> > add this and a dmesg log to the buzilla? It seems like other people
> > should be seeing the same problem, so I'm hoping to grub around on the
> > web to see if there are similar reports involving these devices.
>
> ASUS Pro WS X570-ACE with AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Possible similar issues:

https://forums.unraid.net/topic/94274-hardware-upgrade-woes/
https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/upgraded-my-home-server-from-intel-to-amd-virtual-disk-stuck-in-degraded-unhealty-state.25535/ (Windows)

> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209725
> >
> > Here's one that is superficially similar:
> > https://linux-hardware.org/index.php?probe=e5f24075e5&log=lspci_all
> > in that it has a RP -- switch -- I211 path. Interestingly, the switch
> > here advertises <64us L1 exit latency instead of the <32us latency
> > your switch advertises. Of course, I can't tell if it's exactly the
> > same switch.
>
> Same chipset it seems
>
> I'm running bios version:
> Version: 2206
> Release Date: 08/13/2020
>
> ANd latest is:
> Version 3003
> 2020/12/07
>
> Will test upgrading that as well, but it could be that they report the
> incorrect latency of the switch - I don't know how many things AGESA
> changes but... It's been updated twice since my upgrade.

I wouldn't be surprised if the advertised exit latencies are writable
by the BIOS because it probably depends on electrical characteristics
outside the switch. If so, it's possible ASUS just screwed it up.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-16 01:11    [W:0.180 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site