lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:02:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 68e10d5ff512 ("ring-buffer: Always check to put back before stamp when crossing pages")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 5b7be9c709e1 ("ring-buffer: Add test to validate the time stamp deltas")
>
> from the ftrace tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index a6268e09160a,7cd888ee9ac7..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@@ -3234,12 -3391,16 +3391,14 @@@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_pe
>
> /* See if we shot pass the end of this buffer page */
> if (unlikely(write > BUF_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> - if (tail != w) {
> - /* before and after may now different, fix it up*/
> - b_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp, &info->before);
> - a_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp, &info->after);
> - if (a_ok && b_ok && info->before != info->after)
> - (void)rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp,
> - info->before, info->after);
> - }
> + /* before and after may now different, fix it up*/
> + b_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp, &info->before);
> + a_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp, &info->after);
> + if (a_ok && b_ok && info->before != info->after)
> + (void)rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp,
> + info->before, info->after);
> + if (a_ok && b_ok)
> + check_buffer(cpu_buffer, info, CHECK_FULL_PAGE);
> return rb_move_tail(cpu_buffer, tail, info);
> }
>

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-14 21:40    [W:0.036 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site