lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Patch v2 6/6] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom-qce: Add v5.4 to binding
From
Date


On 12/7/20 5:09 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:52:33AM -0500, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>> Add compatible string to support v5.4 crypto engine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
>> index fdd53b184ba8..ed1ede9c0acc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
>> @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ Qualcomm crypto engine driver
>>
>> Required properties:
>>
>> -- compatible : should be "qcom,crypto-v5.1"
>> +- compatible : should be
>> + "qcom,crypto-v5.1" for ipq6018
>> + "qcom,crypto-v5.4" for sdm845
>
> An outstanding example of why to use SoC specific compatibles rather
> than versions. Keep v5.1, but use SoC compatibles going forward.

Hi Rob,

Thanks for the review. We have different Soc's using the same version of
the ip. Is it okay to have "qcom,sdm845-crypto", "qcom,crypto-v5.4" amd
have only "qcom,crypto-<version>" in the driver ?

>
>> - reg : specifies base physical address and size of the registers map
>> - clocks : phandle to clock-controller plus clock-specifier pair
>> - clock-names : "iface" clocks register interface
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>

--
Warm Regards
Thara

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-12 16:30    [W:0.835 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site