Messages in this thread | | | From | "Gross, Mark" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 16/22] xlink-ipc: Add xlink ipc driver | Date | Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:12:36 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 4:14 AM > To: Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@intel.com> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>; mgross@linux.intel.com; > markgross@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; bp@suse.de; > damien.lemoal@wdc.com; dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com; corbet@lwn.net; > leonard.crestez@nxp.com; palmerdabbelt@google.com; > paul.walmsley@sifive.com; peng.fan@nxp.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; > shawnguo@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > doc@vger.kernel.org; Ryan Carnaghi <ryan.r.carnaghi@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] xlink-ipc: Add xlink ipc driver > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:33:02AM +0000, Kelly, Seamus wrote: > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Must be something Seamus is using that knows when emails go outside. I would have caught this on our internal mock reviews otherwise.
> > Now deleted! > > This footer is incompatible with Linux kernel development, please remove it in > order for us to read your emails and do anything with them. Yes, I know.
> > I can't believe that Intel still has this problem, after all of these years... I'll add a warning about this in my training collateral and have all engineers I work with on this type of upstreaming send a test email to markgross@kernel.org so I can see if they have such legal clauses appended to out-bound email that is not visible to internal recipients. I'll fix this.
Sorry,
--mark
| |