Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on ARM64 | From | Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <> | Date | Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:25:22 -0800 |
| |
On 12/1/20 11:15 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 11:10 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >> On 12/1/20 3:34 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: >>> On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 06:38 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >>>> On 11/21/20 5:57 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:22:35AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >>> >>>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h | 1 - >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile | 7 +- >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c | 32 -------- >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c | 106 ++----------------------- >>>>>> drivers/of/Makefile | 9 +++ >>>>> >>>>>> drivers/of/ima_kexec.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> drivers/of/kexec_fdt.c | 55 +++++++++++++ >>>>> >>>>> Does this need to be 2 files? Just kexec.c? >>>> >>>> Since the functions defined in "ima_kexec.c" and "kexec_fdt.c" are >>>> enabled on 2 different kernel CONFIGs, keeping them in 2 files enables >>>> us to avoid using "#ifdef" in C files. >>> >>> Normally that is true, but just as all of the kexec related functions >>> are co-located in ima/ima_kexec.c, co-locating all of the kexec related >>> functions in drivers/of makes sense. >>> >> >> Sounds good - i'll make the change. >> Instead of "#ifdef" will use "IS_ENABLED" macro, and define the kexec >> related functions in drivers/of/ima_kexec.c > > Perhaps name the file kexec.c, as Rob suggested. >
Will do.
thanks, -lakshmi
| |