lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/4] DCMI BT656 parallel bus mode support
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Sakari
>
> On 11/6/20 12:53 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> > > Hi Huges
> > >
> > > On 11/4/20 6:32 PM, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> > > > Add support of BT656 embedded synchronization bus.
> > > > This mode allows to save hardware synchro lines hsync & vsync
> > > > by replacing them with synchro codes embedded in data stream.
> > > > Add "bus-type" property and make it required so that there is no
> > > > ambiguity between parallel mode (bus-type=5) and BT656 mode (bus-type=6).
> > > >
> > > > ===========
> > > > = history =
> > > > ===========
> > > > version 5:
> > > > - Add revisited bindings and devicetree with explicit use of "bus-type"
> > > >
> > > > version 4:
> > > > - Fix typo in commit message
> > > >
> > > > version 3:
> > > > - Fix bus_width print to %u as per Sakari comment
> > > >
> > > > version 2:
> > > > - As per Sakari remark, revisit commit message and document
> > > > BT656 parallel bus mode in bindings
> > > >
> > > > version 1:
> > > > - Initial submission
> > > >
> > > > Hugues Fruchet (4):
> > > > media: stm32-dcmi: add support of BT656 bus
> > > > media: dt-bindings: media: st,stm32-dcmi: add support of BT656 bus
> > > > ARM: dts: stm32: set bus-type in DCMI endpoint for stm32mp157c-ev1
> > > > board
> > > > ARM: dts: stm32: set bus-type in DCMI endpoint for stm32429i-eval
> > > > board
> > > >
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32-dcmi.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts | 1 +
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'll take DT patches on stm32-next tree.
> >
> > Just checking: that is only the two last patches in the set, or also the
> > binding patch?
>
> Usually I let drivers/subsystem maintainer taking dt-bindings patches with
> drivers patches.
> (If binding changes come only with dts(i) patches I take them in my tree)
>
> -->So yes I'll take only the last two patches.

Ack, thanks!

--
Sakari Ailus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-10 00:47    [W:0.058 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site