lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next] net: skb_vlan_untag(): don't reset transport offset if set by GRO layer
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 21:29:01 +0000 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Similar to commit fda55eca5a33f
> ("net: introduce skb_transport_header_was_set()"), avoid resetting
> transport offsets that were already set by GRO layer. This not only
> mirrors the behavior of __netif_receive_skb_core(), but also makes
> sense when it comes to UDP GSO fraglists forwarding: transport offset
> of such skbs is set only once by GRO receive callback and remains
> untouched and correct up to the xmitting driver in 1:1 case, but
> becomes junk after untagging in ingress VLAN case and breaks UDP
> GSO offload. This does not happen after this change, and all types
> of forwarding of UDP GSO fraglists work as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index c5e6c0b83a92..39c13b9cf79d 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -5441,9 +5441,11 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_vlan_untag(struct sk_buff *skb)
> goto err_free;
>
> skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> - skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> skb_reset_mac_len(skb);
>
> + if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb))
> + skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> +

Patch looks fine, thanks, but I don't understand why you decided to
move the reset? It's not like it's not in order of headers, either.
Let's keep the series of resets identical to __netif_receive_skb_core(),
shall we?

> return skb;
>
> err_free:

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-10 00:30    [W:2.446 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site