Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:44:20 +0100 | From | Miquel Raynal <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/23] Rid W=1 warnings in MTD |
| |
Hi Lee,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote on Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:32:47 +0000:
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > Lee Jones (23): > > mtd: mtdpart: Fix misdocumented function parameter 'mtd' > > mtd: devices: phram: File headers are not good candidates for > > kernel-doc > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting > > mtd: devices: docg3: Fix kernel-doc 'bad line' and 'excessive doc' > > issues > > mtd: mtdcore: Fix misspelled function parameter 'section' > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_bbt: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting > > mtd: spi-nor: controllers: hisi-sfc: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc > > mtd: ubi: build: Document 'ubi_num' in struct mtd_dev_param > > mtd: nand: spi: toshiba: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc header > > mtd: ubi: kapi: Correct documentation for 'ubi_leb_read_sg's 'sgl' > > parameter > > mtd: ubi: eba: Fix a couple of misdocumentation issues > > mtd: ubi: wl: Fix a couple of kernel-doc issues > > mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: brcmnand: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc > > headers > > mtd: ubi: gluebi: Fix misnamed function parameter documentation > > mtd: nand: raw: diskonchip: Marking unused variables as > > __always_unused > > mtd: nand: raw: cafe_nand: Remove superfluous param doc and add > > another > > mtd: nand: raw: s3c2410: Add documentation for 2 missing struct > > members > > mtd: nand: raw: omap_elm: Finish half populated function header, > > demote empty ones > > mtd: nand: raw: omap2: Fix a bunch of kernel-doc misdemeanours > > mtd: nand: raw: sunxi_nand: Document 'sunxi_nfc's 'caps' member > > mtd: nand: raw: arasan-nand-controller: Document 'anfc_op's 'buf' > > member > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours > > mtd: devices: powernv_flash: Add function names to headers and fix > > 'dev' > > May I ask; what is the plan for these patches please? > > Do you plan on taking the ones that do not require re-work, rather > than fixing up and re-submitting the whole set. It would certainly > save a lot of mailing list churn if that were the case. > > Either way, let me know and I will abide by your decision. >
I would prefer receiving a v2 with all the patches if you don't mind.
Thanks, Miquèl
| |