Messages in this thread | | | From | Michael Ellerman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH seccomp 3/8] powerpc: Enable seccomp architecture tracking | Date | Thu, 05 Nov 2020 22:26:44 +1100 |
| |
YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:22 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: >> > +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ >> >> As Kees mentioned this should (must?!) match the configured endian. >> >> But I think it would still be better to use the CONFIG symbol, which is >> CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. > > My attempt here is to be consistent with asm/syscall.h > syscall_get_arch [1]. Would it make sense to change that to > CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN then? > > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h#L116
Looking across the tree with have thousands of usages of __LITTLE_ENDIAN__, so it's probably not worth converting to CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN.
>> > +# define SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE (AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64 | __SECCOMP_ARCH_LE) >> >> You use __SECCOMP_ARCH_LE there, but previously you only defined >> __SECCOMP_ARCH_LE_BIT. >> >> Is there some magic somewhere that defines __SECCOMP_ARCH_LE based on >> __SECCOMP_ARCH_LE_BIT ? > > Oops, my bad here.
OK :)
>> > +# define SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE_NR NR_syscalls >> > +# define SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE_NAME "ppc64" >> >> What's the name used for? > > This is used in the last patch in this series to report in procfs the > name of each architecture tracked by the bitmap cache.
OK, yeah I think it would be better if the matched the uname -m values.
>> Usually we use "ppc64" for 64-bit big endian and "ppc64le" for 64-bit >> little endian. >> >> And usually we use "ppc" for 32-bit. > > Ok.
cheers
| |