Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:39:26 +0100 | From | Vincent Whitchurch <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add DA9121 |
| |
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:57:55PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:00:20 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote: > > Add bindings for the Dialog Semiconductor DA9121 voltage regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> > > --- > > .../bindings/regulator/dlg,da9121.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/dlg,da9121.yaml > > > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/dlg,da9121.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/dlg,da9121.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: > warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/dlg,da9121.yaml > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1392753
OK, thanks. I'll fix it by changing the unevaluatedProperties to an additionalProperties (since the $ref has moved).
I think I should also move the unevaluatedProperties to the buck1 level instead of removing it completely, because I see a bunch of other regulator bindings doing it, but the checks don't complain about that being missing and I can't see that making any difference for the validation.
For example, I was hoping that this:
buck1: description: Initial data for the Buck1 regulator. $ref: "regulator.yaml#" type: object unevaluatedProperties: false
would complain about something like:
buck1 { not-a-real-property; regulator-min-microvolt = <680000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <820000>; };
but it doesn't, so I don't quite understand what "unevaluatedProperties: false" prevents.
> > The base for the patch is generally the last rc1. Any dependencies > should be noted. > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to > date: > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Not sure if it's just something wrong in my setup, but I had dtschema installed from master a while ago, and the above command didn't upgrade it for me. I had to explicitly upgrade it with the full URL again to get the latest version:
pip3 install --upgrade git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master
| |