Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: sifive: Refactor __prci_clock array by using macro | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Date | Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:50:45 -0800 |
| |
Quoting Zong Li (2020-10-16 02:18:26) > Refactor code by using DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK to define each clock > and reduce duplicate code.
What is duplicate?
> > Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com> > --- > drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c | 38 ++++++---------- > drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.h | 2 +- > drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c | 74 ++++++++++++-------------------- > drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h | 2 +- > drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c | 2 +- > drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h | 10 ++++- > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > index 840b97bfff85..d43b9a9984f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > @@ -54,29 +54,19 @@ static const struct clk_ops sifive_fu540_prci_tlclksel_clk_ops = { > .recalc_rate = sifive_prci_tlclksel_recalc_rate, > }; > > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu540, corepll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_corepll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu540, ddrpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_ro_clk_ops, &__prci_ddrpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu540, gemgxlpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_gemgxlpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu540, tlclk, corepll, > + &sifive_fu540_prci_tlclksel_clk_ops, NULL);
Readability looks to decrease with this change. Why should all us code reviewers suffer because the code author wants to type a few less characters? Named initializers are useful so we don't have to hold each macro argument in our head and map it to the struct member that is being initialized.
> + > /* List of clock controls provided by the PRCI */ > -struct __prci_clock __prci_init_clocks_fu540[] = { > - [PRCI_CLK_COREPLL] = { > - .name = "corepll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_corepll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_DDRPLL] = { > - .name = "ddrpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_ro_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_ddrpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_GEMGXLPLL] = { > - .name = "gemgxlpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu540_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_gemgxlpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_TLCLK] = { > - .name = "tlclk", > - .parent_name = "corepll", > - .ops = &sifive_fu540_prci_tlclksel_clk_ops, > - }, > +struct __prci_clock *__prci_init_clocks_fu540[] = { > + [PRCI_CLK_COREPLL] = &fu540_corepll, > + [PRCI_CLK_DDRPLL] = &fu540_ddrpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_GEMGXLPLL] = &fu540_gemgxlpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_TLCLK] = &fu540_tlclk, > }; > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.h b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.h > index c8271efa7bdc..281200cd8848 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.h > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > > #define NUM_CLOCK_FU540 4 > > -extern struct __prci_clock __prci_init_clocks_fu540[NUM_CLOCK_FU540]; > +extern struct __prci_clock *__prci_init_clocks_fu540[NUM_CLOCK_FU540]; > > static const struct prci_clk_desc prci_clk_fu540 = { > .clks = __prci_init_clocks_fu540, > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c > index 3b87e273c3eb..676cad2c3886 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c > @@ -71,52 +71,32 @@ static const struct clk_ops sifive_fu740_prci_hfpclkplldiv_clk_ops = { > .recalc_rate = sifive_prci_hfpclkplldiv_recalc_rate, > }; > > + > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, corepll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_corepll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, ddrpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_ro_clk_ops, &__prci_ddrpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, gemgxlpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_gemgxlpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, dvfscorepll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_dvfscorepll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, hfpclkpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_hfpclkpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, cltxpll, hfclk, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, &__prci_cltxpll_data); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, tlclk, corepll, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_tlclksel_clk_ops, NULL); > +DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(fu740, pclk, hfpclkpll, > + &sifive_fu740_prci_hfpclkplldiv_clk_ops, NULL); > + > /* List of clock controls provided by the PRCI */ > -struct __prci_clock __prci_init_clocks_fu740[] = { > - [PRCI_CLK_COREPLL] = { > - .name = "corepll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_corepll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_DDRPLL] = { > - .name = "ddrpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_ro_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_ddrpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_GEMGXLPLL] = { > - .name = "gemgxlpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_gemgxlpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_DVFSCOREPLL] = { > - .name = "dvfscorepll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_dvfscorepll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_HFPCLKPLL] = { > - .name = "hfpclkpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_hfpclkpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_CLTXPLL] = { > - .name = "cltxpll", > - .parent_name = "hfclk", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_wrpll_clk_ops, > - .pwd = &__prci_cltxpll_data, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_TLCLK] = { > - .name = "tlclk", > - .parent_name = "corepll", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_tlclksel_clk_ops, > - }, > - [PRCI_CLK_PCLK] = { > - .name = "pclk", > - .parent_name = "hfpclkpll", > - .ops = &sifive_fu740_prci_hfpclkplldiv_clk_ops, > - }, > +struct __prci_clock *__prci_init_clocks_fu740[] = { > + [PRCI_CLK_COREPLL] = &fu740_corepll, > + [PRCI_CLK_DDRPLL] = &fu740_ddrpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_GEMGXLPLL] = &fu740_gemgxlpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_DVFSCOREPLL] = &fu740_dvfscorepll, > + [PRCI_CLK_HFPCLKPLL] = &fu740_hfpclkpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_CLTXPLL] = &fu740_cltxpll, > + [PRCI_CLK_TLCLK] = &fu740_tlclk, > + [PRCI_CLK_PCLK] = &fu740_pclk, > };
I suppose this is fine and then non-macro structs above this array of pointers.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h > index 13ef971f7764..3f03295f719a 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > > #define NUM_CLOCK_FU740 8 > > -extern struct __prci_clock __prci_init_clocks_fu740[NUM_CLOCK_FU740]; > +extern struct __prci_clock *__prci_init_clocks_fu740[NUM_CLOCK_FU740]; > > static const struct prci_clk_desc prci_clk_fu740 = { > .clks = __prci_init_clocks_fu740, > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c > index 4098dbc5881a..2ef3f9f91b33 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int __prci_register_clocks(struct device *dev, struct __prci_data *pd, > > /* Register PLLs */ > for (i = 0; i < desc->num_clks; ++i) { > - pic = &(desc->clks[i]); > + pic = desc->clks[i];
This is related how?
> > init.name = pic->name; > init.parent_names = &pic->parent_name; > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h > index bc0646bc9c3e..e6c9f72e20de 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h > @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ struct __prci_clock { > struct __prci_data *pd; > }; > > +#define DEFINE_PRCI_CLOCK(_platform, _name, _parent, _ops, _pwd) \ > + static struct __prci_clock _platform##_##_name = { \ > + .name = #_name, \ > + .parent_name = #_parent, \ > + .ops = _ops, \ > + .pwd = _pwd, \ > + } \ > + > #define clk_hw_to_prci_clock(pwd) container_of(pwd, struct __prci_clock, hw) > > /* > @@ -261,7 +269,7 @@ struct __prci_clock { > * @num_clks: the number of element of clks > */ > struct prci_clk_desc { > - struct __prci_clock *clks; > + struct __prci_clock **clks;
Huh? Nothing in the commit text mentions this.
> size_t num_clks; > };
| |