lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/signal: Introduce helpers to get the maximum signal frame size
Date

> On Nov 25, 2020, at 20:17, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:02:34AM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigframe.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigframe.h
>> index 84eab2724875..ac77f3f90bc9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigframe.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigframe.h
>> @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ struct rt_sigframe_ia32 {
>> char retcode[8];
>> /* fp state follows here */
>> };
>> +
>> +#define SIZEOF_sigframe_ia32 sizeof(struct sigframe_ia32)
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe_ia32 sizeof(struct rt_sigframe_ia32)
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +#define SIZEOF_sigframe_ia32 0
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe_ia32 0
>> +
>> #endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> @@ -81,8 +90,22 @@ struct rt_sigframe_x32 {
>> /* fp state follows here */
>> };
>>
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe_x32 sizeof(struct rt_sigframe_x32)
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI */
>>
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe sizeof(struct rt_sigframe)
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe 0
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>>
>> +#ifndef SIZEOF_rt_sigframe_x32
>> +#define SIZEOF_rt_sigframe_x32 0
>> +#endif
>
> Those are defined here to be used in only one place -
> init_sigframe_size() - where there already is ifdeffery. Just use the
> normal sizeof() operator there instead of adding more gunk here.

[ Just want to clarify your comment. ]

Admittedly, this is an (ugly) workaround to avoid compile errors.

E.g. when code is written like this in the function:

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI))
size = max(size, sizeof(struct rt_sigframe_x32));

and compile with CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI=n, got such a message:

"invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct
sigframe_ia32’"

While the coding-style doc [1] seems to mention this:

"However, this approach still allows the C compiler to see the
code inside the block, and check it for correctness (syntax,
types, symbol references, etc). Thus, you still have to use an
#ifdef if the code inside the block references symbols that
will not exist if the condition is not met.”

In general, putting #ifdef in a C file is advised to avoid. I wonder
whether it is okay to include #ifdef in the C file in this case.

Thanks,
Chang

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/coding-style.html
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-30 21:42    [W:0.559 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site