Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:11:15 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/dumpstack: Fix misleading instruction pointer error message |
| |
On 11/03, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > I'm thinking this should not use the atomic variant if it can get called > > > in !atomic context too. > > > > For what? > > I'm thinking copy_code() should not use copy_from_user_nmi() if former > can be called in non-atomic context too.
I understand, but why do you think this makes sense?
Say, do you think it is fine to block in fuse_readpage() ?
Anyway, this is off-topic and I won't argue.
Oleg.
| |