lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH rdma-next v5 0/3] Track memory allocation with restrack DB help (Part II)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:01:45AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Changelog:
> v5:
> * Reorder patches to postpone changes in rdma_restrack_add to be in next series.
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201104144008.3808124-1-leon@kernel.org/
> * Rebased on latest for-upstream, all that time the patches were in
> our regression and didn't introduce any issues.
> * Took first five patches that hadn't any comments
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200926101938.2964394-1-leon@kernel.org
> * Rebased on already accepted patches.
> * Added mlx4 special QPs to the list of not-tracked QPs (dropped previous mlx4 special QP patch).
> * Separated to two patches change in return value of cma_listen_* routines.
> * Changed commit messages and added Fixes as Jason requested.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200907122156.478360-1-leon@kernel.org/
> * Added new patch to fix mlx4 failure on SR-IOV, it didn't have port set.
> * Changed "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy" patch.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200830101436.108487-1-leon@kernel.org
> * Fixed rebase error, deleted second assignment of qp_type.
> * Rebased code on latests rdma-next, the changes in cma.c caused to change
> in patch "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy".
> * Dropped patch of port assignment, it is already done as part of this
> series.
> * I didn't add @calller description, regular users should not use _named() funciton.
> v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824104415.1090901-1-leon@kernel.org
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Leon Romanovsky (3):
> RDMA/core: Track device memory MRs
> RDMA/core: Allow drivers to disable restrack DB
> RDMA/restrack: Support all QP types

Applied to for-next, thanks

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-27 17:05    [W:0.044 / U:5.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site