[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/9] regulator: Update DA9121 dt-bindings
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Adam Ward wrote:
> Actually, perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't quite see why this
> move to a sub-node is needed. There is some flexibility in the
> regulator framework for this as I noted earlier
> (
> For the case of an MFD it certainly makes sense to have a "regulators"
> sub-node but for these chips it seems rather redundant.

This sub-node looks fairly well instituted for devices with multiple regulators.
There's also the possibility to add GPIO support into another sub-node for all the variants.

Mark, do you have a preference?

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-27 14:03    [W:0.063 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site