lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 17/47] dt-bindings: memory: tegra20: Add memory client IDs
    On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
    > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 18:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
    > >
    > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:26:05PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
    > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:48:53PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
    > > > > Each memory client has unique hardware ID, add these IDs.
    > > > >
    > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
    > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
    > > > > ---
    > > > > include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra20-mc.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    > > > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
    > > >
    > > > Is there any chance you could drop these dt-bindings include patches
    > > > (17, 18 and 19) so that I can pick them up into the Tegra tree? The
    > > > device tree changes that I was going to pick up depend on this and
    > > > fail to build if applied as-is.
    > > >
    > > > I was looking at your linux-mem-ctrl tree and had initially thought I
    > > > could just pull in one of the branches to get these dependencies, but it
    > > > looks like the dt-bindings patches are on the for-v5.11/tegra-mc branch,
    > > > which the ARM SoC maintainers wouldn't like to see me pull in for a
    > > > dependency on device tree changes.
    > >
    > > Partially you answered here. :) Since you should not pull my branch into
    > > a DT branch, you also should not put these include/dt-bindings patches
    > > there. SoC guys will complain about this as well.
    > >
    > > These patches are also needed for the driver, so if you take them, I
    > > would need them back in a pull request. SoC folks could spot it as well
    > > and point that such merge should not happen.
    >
    > It seems I was wrong - these patches are not needed for the driver
    > code. Neither in applied parts nor in upcoming Dmitry's work. In such
    > case I could rework my branches and send a new pull request. The
    > patches would stay only in your tree.

    Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the driver doesn't actually need
    these. I'll take your Acked-bys and put these three patches into the
    Tegra tree, then.

    Thanks,
    Thierry
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-11-26 19:03    [W:2.997 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site