lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scsi: zfcp: fix use-after-free in zfcp_unit_remove
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:07:32PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
> 在 2020/11/26 17:42, Benjamin Block 写道:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:27:41 +0800
> > > Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > > 在 2020/11/26 1:06, Benjamin Block 写道:
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:48:54PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
....
> > Let's go by example. If we assume the reference count of `unit->dev` is
> > R, and the function starts with R = 1 (otherwise the deivce would've
> > been freed already), we get:
> >
> > int zfcp_unit_remove(struct zfcp_port *port, u64 fcp_lun)
> > {
> > struct zfcp_unit *unit;
> > struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > write_lock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
> > // unit->dev (R = 1)
> > unit = _zfcp_unit_find(port, fcp_lun);
> > // get_device(&unit->dev)
> > // unit->dev (R = 2)
> > if (unit)
> > list_del(&unit->list);
> > write_unlock_irq(&port->unit_list_lock);
> > if (!unit)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > sdev = zfcp_unit_sdev(unit);
> > if (sdev) {
> > scsi_remove_device(sdev);
> > scsi_device_put(sdev);
> > }
> > // unit->dev (R = 2)
> > put_device(&unit->dev);
> > // unit->dev (R = 1)
> > device_unregister(&unit->dev);
> > // unit->dev (R = 0)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > If we now apply this patch, we'd end up with R = 1 after
> > `device_unregister()`, and the device would not be properly removed.
> >
> > If you still think that's wrong, then you'll need to better explain why.
> >
> Hi Banjamin and Cornelia,
>
> Your replies make me reliaze that I've been holding a mistake understanding
> of put_device() as well as reference count.
>
> Thanks for you two's patient explanation !!
>
> BTW, should I send a v2 on these two patches to move the position of
> put_device()?

Feel free to do so.

I think having the `put_device()` call after `device_unregister()` in
both `zfcp_unit_remove()` and `zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_store()` is more
natural, because it ought to be the last time we touch the object in
both functions.


--
Best Regards, Benjamin Block / Linux on IBM Z Kernel Development / IBM Systems
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / https://www.ibm.com/privacy
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Gregor Pillen / Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-26 16:16    [W:0.081 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site