lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 2/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:57:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
> of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
> User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
> result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
> pcie_ports_native is unset.
>
> Also, since struct pci_host_bridge ->native_* members caches the
> ownership status of various PCIe capabilities, use them instead
> of distributed checks for pcie_ports_native.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index 50a9522ab07d..ccd5e0ce5605 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> int services = 0;
>
> - if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)) {
> + if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge && host->native_pcie_hotplug) {

This is a nit, but I think this and similar checks should be reordered
so we do the most generic test first, i.e.,

if (host->native_pcie_hotplug && dev->is_hotplug_bridge)

Logically there's no point in looking at the device things if we
don't have native control.

> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>
> /*
> @@ -221,8 +220,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
> - if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)) {
> + if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() && host->native_aer) {

Can't we clear host->native_aer when pci_aer_available() returns
false? I'd like to have all the checks about whether we have native
control to be in one place instead of being scattered. Something like
this above:

OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_aer);
if (!pci_aer_available())
host_bridge->native_aer = 0;

So this test would become:

if (host->native_aer && dev->aer_cap)
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
>
> /*
> @@ -238,8 +236,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> * Event Collectors can also generate PMEs, but we don't handle
> * those yet.
> */
> - if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT && host->native_pme) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;

Also here:

if (host->native_pme && pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-25 21:29    [W:0.146 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site