lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.4 158/158] sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
Date
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>

commit 8e1ac4299a6e8726de42310d9c1379f188140c71 upstream.

enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
condition pretty much a nop.

Fix this by saving the flag early on.

Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112111201.2081902-1-qperret@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5228,6 +5228,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
int idle_h_nr_running = task_has_idle_policy(p);
+ int task_new = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);

/*
* The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
@@ -5299,7 +5300,7 @@ enqueue_throttle:
* into account, but that is not straightforward to implement,
* and the following generally works well enough in practice.
*/
- if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
+ if (!task_new)
update_overutilized_status(rq);

}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-23 14:09    [W:0.468 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site