lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] kcsan: Avoid scheduler recursion by using non-instrumented preempt_{disable,enable}()
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 02:23:00PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> When enabling KCSAN for kernel/sched (remove KCSAN_SANITIZE := n from
> kernel/sched/Makefile), with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y, we can observe
> recursion due to:
>
> check_access() [via instrumentation]
> kcsan_setup_watchpoint()
> reset_kcsan_skip()
> kcsan_prandom_u32_max()
> get_cpu_var()
> preempt_disable()
> preempt_count_add() [in kernel/sched/core.c]
> check_access() [via instrumentation]
>
> Avoid this by rewriting kcsan_prandom_u32_max() to only use safe
> versions of preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() that do not call into
> scheduler code.
>
> Note, while this currently does not affect an unmodified kernel, it'd be
> good to keep a KCSAN kernel working when KCSAN_SANITIZE := n is removed
> from kernel/sched/Makefile to permit testing scheduler code with KCSAN
> if desired.
>
> Fixes: cd290ec24633 ("kcsan: Use tracing-safe version of prandom")
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Update comment to also point out preempt_enable().
> ---
> kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/core.c b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> index 3994a217bde7..10513f3e2349 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> @@ -284,10 +284,19 @@ should_watch(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, struct kcsan_ctx *
> */
> static u32 kcsan_prandom_u32_max(u32 ep_ro)
> {
> - struct rnd_state *state = &get_cpu_var(kcsan_rand_state);
> - const u32 res = prandom_u32_state(state);
> + struct rnd_state *state;
> + u32 res;
> +
> + /*
> + * Avoid recursion with scheduler by using non-tracing versions of
> + * preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() that do not call into
> + * scheduler code.
> + */
> + preempt_disable_notrace();
> + state = raw_cpu_ptr(&kcsan_rand_state);
> + res = prandom_u32_state(state);
> + preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();

This is a preemption bug. Does preempt_enable_notrace() not work?

>
> - put_cpu_var(kcsan_rand_state);
> return (u32)(((u64) res * ep_ro) >> 32);
> }
>
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-23 14:56    [W:0.056 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site