Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.9 11/16] i2c: mux: pca954x: Add missing pca9546 definition to chip_desc | Date | Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:03:16 +0100 |
| |
From: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
commit dbe4d69d252e9e65c6c46826980b77b11a142065 upstream.
The spec for the pca9546 was missing. This chip is the same as the pca9545 except that it lacks interrupt lines. While the i2c_device_id table mapped the pca9546 to the pca9545 definition the compatible table did not.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static const struct chip_desc chips[] = .nchans = 4, .muxtype = pca954x_isswi, }, + [pca_9546] = { + .nchans = 4, + .muxtype = pca954x_isswi, + }, [pca_9547] = { .nchans = 8, .enable = 0x8, @@ -113,7 +117,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pca954 { "pca9543", pca_9543 }, { "pca9544", pca_9544 }, { "pca9545", pca_9545 }, - { "pca9546", pca_9545 }, + { "pca9546", pca_9546 }, { "pca9547", pca_9547 }, { "pca9548", pca_9548 }, { }
| |