lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drm/hisilicon: Remove redundant null check
From
Date


在 2020/11/2 17:03, Thomas Zimmermann 写道:
> Hi
>
> Am 02.11.20 um 09:46 schrieb tiantao (H):
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/11/2 16:32, Thomas Zimmermann 写道:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 30.10.20 um 10:27 schrieb Tian Tao:
>>>> drm_irq_uninstall can handle the case where dev->irq_enable is false,
>>>> so Remove redundant null check.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c | 6 +++---
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
>>>> index 0c1b40d..b71589b1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
>>>> @@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static int hibmc_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>         drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
>>>>   -    if (dev->irq_enabled)
>>>> -        drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
>>>> -
>>>> +    drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
>>>
>>> Removing this check would at least result in an error, [1] so rather
>>> leave it in for now.
>>>
>> Now there seems to be no driver to check the return value of
>> drm_irq_uninstall
>
> True. No clean-up code should ever fail. But currently, it's not handled
> by drm_irq_uninstall().
>
> A better fix would be to have drm_irq_uninstall() return early with a
> warning if IRQs are disabled. And for most drivers, a managed version of
> drm_irq_install() would be useful.
>
Codes like the following
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 09d6e9e..572357c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int drm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
bool irq_enabled;
int i;

+ if(!dev->irq_enabled || !dev)
+ return 0;
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>> Instead, we could discuss if drm_irq_install() should become a managed
>>> interface.
>>
>> Codes like the following
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> index 09d6e9e..572357c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int drm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
>>         bool irq_enabled;
>>         int i;
>>
>> +       if(!dev->irq_enabled || !dev)
>> +               return 0;
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c#L201
>>>
>>>
>>>>       pci_disable_msi(dev->pdev);
>>>> +
>>>>       hibmc_kms_fini(priv);
>>>>       hibmc_mm_fini(priv);
>>>>       dev->dev_private = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>>       return 0;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-02 10:09    [W:0.034 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site