Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:06:24 -0800 | From | Sean Christopherson <> | Subject | Re: [RFC Patch 0/2] KVM: SVM: Cgroup support for SVM SEV ASIDs |
| |
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:48:10PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote: > > I agree with you that the abstract name is better than the concrete > > name, I also feel that we must provide HW extensions. Here is one > > approach: > > > > Cgroup name: cpu_encryption, encryption_slots, or memcrypt (open to > > suggestions) > > > > Control files: slots.{max, current, events}
I don't particularly like the "slots" name, mostly because it could be confused with KVM's memslots. Maybe encryption_ids.ids.{max, current, events}? I don't love those names either, but "encryption" and "IDs" are the two obvious commonalities betwee TDX's encryption key IDs and SEV's encryption address space IDs.
| |