Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function. | From | Matthias Brugger <> | Date | Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:57:50 +0100 |
| |
On 19/11/2020 09:32, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> >> >> On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>>>> On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next >>>>> then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to >>>>> provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise? >>>> >>>> I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing >>>> topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid >>>> merge conflicts. >>> >>> I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants >>> to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to >>> be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating >>> the commit. >>> >> >> Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this >> patch into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you >> provide me a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your >> whole tree? > > Oh, I see. I thought you wanted to develop on top of it. Apologies. > > PR to follow (I'll reply directly to the patch). >
No problems. Thanks a lot!
Matthias
| |