lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function.
From
Date


On 19/11/2020 09:32, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>> On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next
>>>>> then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to
>>>>> provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise?
>>>>
>>>> I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing
>>>> topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid
>>>> merge conflicts.
>>>
>>> I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants
>>> to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to
>>> be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating
>>> the commit.
>>>
>>
>> Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this
>> patch into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you
>> provide me a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your
>> whole tree?
>
> Oh, I see. I thought you wanted to develop on top of it. Apologies.
>
> PR to follow (I'll reply directly to the patch).
>

No problems. Thanks a lot!

Matthias

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-19 18:01    [W:0.096 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site