lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:46 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:53 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:42:53PM -0800, Tao Ren wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:27:19AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:09:27PM -0800, rentao.bupt@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > From: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch series adds hardware monitoring driver for the Maxim MAX127
> > > > > > chip.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Tao
> > > > >
> > > > > Why are using sending a hwmon driver to the networking mailing list?
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > I added netdev because the mailing list is included in "get_maintainer.pl
> > > > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst" output. Is it the right command to find
> > > > reviewers? Could you please suggest? Thank you.
> > >
> > > I have no idea why running get_maintainer.pl on
> > > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst returns such a large list of mailing
> > > lists and people. For some reason it includes everyone in the XDP
> > > maintainer list. If anyone has an idea how that happens, please
> > > let me know - we'll want to get this fixed to avoid the same problem
> > > in the future.
> >
> > I found it. The XDP maintainer entry has:
> >
> > K: xdp
> >
> > This matches Documentation/hwmon/index.rst.
> >
> > $ grep xdp Documentation/hwmon/index.rst
> > xdpe12284
> >
> > It seems to me that a context match such as "xdp" in MAINTAINERS isn't
> > really appropriate. "xdp" matches a total of 348 files in the kernel.
> > The large majority of those is not XDP related. The maintainers
> > of XDP (and all the listed mailing lists) should not be surprised
> > to get a large number of odd review requests if they want to review
> > every single patch on files which include the term "xdp".
>
> Agreed, we should fix this. For maintainers with high patch volume life
> would be so much easier if people CCed the right folks to get reviews,
> so we should try our best to fix get_maintainer.
>
> XDP folks, any opposition to changing the keyword / filename to:
>
> [^a-z0-9]xdp[^a-z0-9]

Reducing regex makes sense.
git grep -l -E "xdp"|wc -l
348
git grep -l -E "[^a-z0-9]xdp[^a-z0-9]"|wc -l
295

The false positive match was:
+drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
+drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Makefile
+drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.h
+drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-config.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-config.h
+drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-traffic.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c
+drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.h
+drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ath5k.h
+drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c
+drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/dma.c

so it's pretty much hwmon and few drivers.
I agree that sparing xdp from hwmon patches is a good thing :)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-19 17:39    [W:0.079 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site