Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function. | From | Matthias Brugger <> | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:56:48 +0100 |
| |
On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>> On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>> >>> If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next >>> then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to >>> provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise? >> >> I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing >> topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid >> merge conflicts. > > I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants > to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to > be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating > the commit. >
Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this patch into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you provide me a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your whole tree?
Regards, Matthias
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20201030113622.201188-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
| |