Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:55:00 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: ak4458: use reset control instead of reset gpio |
| |
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:17:36PM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:20:36AM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> > One thing I'm not clear on is if there's some way to ensure that we don't have > > different instances of the device resetting each other without them noticing? > > Shouldn't be an issue in practice for the use here.
> The way to ensure that we don't have different instances of the device resetting each > other is to rely on the way the "shared" reset is handled by reset API: > ========== > + ak4458->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(ak4458->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(ak4458->reset)) > + return PTR_ERR(ak4458->reset); > ==========
Flip side of that then, how do we know when a reset has actually happened? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |