lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc unique ID
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 07:10:28AM +0000, Alice Guo wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2020年11月17日 0:03
> > To: Alice Guo <alice.guo@nxp.com>
> > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
> > dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>;
> > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding
> > doc for soc unique ID
> >
> > Caution: EXT Email
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:04:13AM +0000, Alice Guo wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > > > Sent: 2020年11月15日 0:50
> > > > To: Alice Guo <alice.guo@nxp.com>
> > > > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
> > > > dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>;
> > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT
> > > > Binding doc for soc unique ID
> > > >
> > > > Caution: EXT Email
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 07:04:06PM +0800, Alice Guo wrote:
> > > > > Add DT Binding doc for the Unique ID of i.MX 8M series.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 25
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > index e4db0f9ed664..f4faebbb57da 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > @@ -901,6 +901,31 @@ properties:
> > > > > - fsl,s32v234-evb # S32V234-EVB2
> > Customer
> > > > Evaluation Board
> > > > > - const: fsl,s32v234
> > > > >
> > > > > + soc:
> > > > > + type: object
> > > > > + properties:
> > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > + oneOf:
> > > > > + - description: i.MX8M SoCs
> > > > > + items:
> > > > > + - enum:
> > > > > + - fsl,imx8mm-soc
> > > > > + - fsl,imx8mn-soc
> > > > > + - fsl,imx8mp-soc
> > > > > + - fsl,imx8mq-soc
> > > > > + - const: simple-bus
> > > > > +
> > > > > + - description: Other SoCs
> > > > > + items:
> > > > > + - const: simple-bus
> > > > > +
> > > > > + nvmem-cells:
> > > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > > + description: Phandle to the SOC Unique ID provided by a
> > > > > + nvmem node
> > > > > +
> > > > > + nvmem-cells-names:
> > > > > + const: soc_unique_id
> > > > > +
> > > > > additionalProperties: true
> > > >
> > > > The "soc" node should be required for these compatibles. Otherwise
> > > > you will have to stay with this
> > > > backwards-compatible-DTB-device-initcall-glue for many years... I think you
> > can achieve it with allOf.
> > > >
> > > [Alice Guo]Hi,
> > > I find that my description for compatible is ambiguous. There are two kinds of
> > compatible of the "soc" node:
> > > 1. For dtsi files used for SoCs other than imx8m series SoCs and old
> > > version dtsi files used for imx8m series SoCs, compatible of the "soc" node is
> > "simple-bus".
> > > 2. For new version dtsi files used for imx8m series SoCs, compatible of the
> > "soc" node is {"fsl,imx8mX-soc","simple-bus"}.
> > >
> > > "nvmem-cell" is an optional property.
> > >
> > > I do not understand what you mean. You mean that limit the compatible of
> > "soc" node must include " fsl,imx8mX-soc" in new version dts files. Is my
> > understanding correct?
> >
> > All new DTS files should have soc node with "fsl,imx8mX-soc" and this should be
> > required by dtschema. The nvmem-cells and related properties do not look like
> > optional. From the hardware perspective - they are always present. From the
> > driver point of view: they are required and driver will fail to work.
>
> [Alice Guo]
> + soc:
> + type: object
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - description: new version DTS for i.MX8M SoCs
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,imx8mm-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mn-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mp-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mq-soc
> + - const: simple-bus
> +
> + - description: other SoCs and old version DTS for i.MX8M SoCs
> + items:
> + - const: simple-bus
> +
> + nvmem-cells:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: Phandle to the SOC Unique ID provided by a nvmem node
> +
> + nvmem-cells-names:
> + const: soc_unique_id
> +
> + allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - fsl,imx8mm-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mn-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mp-soc
> + - fsl,imx8mq-soc
> + const: simple-bus
> +
> + then:
> + required:
> + - nvmem-cells
> + - nvmem-cells-names
>
> The above is my modification. Is that ok?

Does not look like solving anything.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-17 08:37    [W:0.098 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site