Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:17:14 +0100 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/13 v4] perf tools: add thread field |
| |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 07:26:54PM +0200, James Clark wrote: > A separate field isn't strictly required. The core > field could be re-used for thread IDs as a single > field was used previously. > > But separating them will avoid confusion and catch > potential errors where core IDs are read as thread > IDs and vice versa. > > Also remove the placeholder id field which is now > no longer used. > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> > --- > tools/perf/tests/topology.c | 8 ++++---- > tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 14 +++++++------- > tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 2 +- > tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 8 ++++---- > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c > index 694f786a77f3..2276db0b1b6f 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map) > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Die ID doesn't match", > session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == id.die); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Node ID is set", id.node == -1); > - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - ID is set", id.id == -1); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Thread is set", id.thread == -1); > } > > // Test that die ID contains socket and die > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map) > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Die ID doesn't match", > session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == id.die); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Node ID is set", id.node == -1); > - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - ID is set", id.id == -1); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Thread is set", id.thread == -1); > } > > // Test that socket ID contains only socket > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map) > session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id == id.socket); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - Node ID is set", id.node == -1); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - Die ID is set", id.die == -1); > - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - ID is set", id.id == -1); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - Thread is set", id.thread == -1); > } > > // Test that node ID contains only node > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map) > id = cpu_map__get_node(map, i, NULL); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - Node ID doesn't match", > cpu__get_node(map->map[i]) == id.node); > - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - ID shouldn't be set", id.id == -1); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - Thread shouldn't be set", id.thread == -1); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - Die ID is set", id.die == -1); > }
should we test all unset parts are -1, like here id.core, id.socket and there are missing tests also in above code
jirka
| |