Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:53:01 -0800 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO |
| |
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:43:56 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 11/12/20 4:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say > > that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix up/follow > > up patch? > > > > Folks keep adding those tags on the next revisions of the their patches > > which is quite misleading. > > I think it's still fair for the lkp folks to get *some* credit for > reporting these bugs. I mean, the stated reason[1] for it existing is: > > The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and > report them and it hopefully inspires them to help us again in > the future. > > I do agree, though, that it's confusing *what* they reported, especially > if the patch in question is fixing something *else*. Rather than invent > a new tag, maybe a comment would suffice: > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> # bug in earlier revision
Fine by me, although its not common to add Reported-by tags for people who point out issues in review, so why add a tag for the bot?
| |