Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs | From | santosh.shilimkar@oracle ... | Date | Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:13:58 -0800 |
| |
On 11/12/20 2:22 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 13:59-20201112, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote: >> On 11/12/20 1:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>> On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>> [..] >>>>> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y >>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >>>>> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16: depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC || >>>>> COMPILE_TEST >>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well. >>>>> >>>>> [0] >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$ >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue, >>>> Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig >>>> updates as well. >>> >>> >>> Santosh, >>> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$ >>> looks available in next now. >>> >>> Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window? >>> >>> Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to >>> prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR >>> you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the >>> symbol. >>> >> >> I can apply SOC kconfig patch [1] to my soc branch. That branch with >> some additional patches am going to send up, so it should >> work. Let me know. > > OK, sounds fine to me, If you can give me a tag, I can add queue up > defconfig on top to prevent bisect issues. > I won't be adding tag till all the commits are lineup but branch will be immutable.
Regards. Santosh
| |