lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Re: [PATCH V4 net-bugfixs] net/ethernet: Update ret when ptp_clock is ERROR
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:25:12AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This is not really getting any better. If Richard is worried about
> > Kconfig getting changed here, I would suggest handling the
> > case of PTP being disabled by returning an error early on in the
> > function, like
> >
> > struct am65_cpts *am65_cpts_create(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs,
> > struct device_node *node)
> > {
> > struct am65_cpts *cpts;
> > int ret, i;
> >
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK))
> > return -ENODEV;
>
> No, please, no. That only adds confusion. The NULL return value
> already signals that the compile time support was missing. That was
> the entire point of this...
>
> * ptp_clock_register() - register a PTP hardware clock driver
> *
> * @info: Structure describing the new clock.
> * @parent: Pointer to the parent device of the new clock.
> *
> * Returns a valid pointer on success or PTR_ERR on failure. If PHC
> * support is missing at the configuration level, this function
> * returns NULL, and drivers are expected to gracefully handle that
> * case separately.

The problem is that the caller doesn't handle that case gracefully,
but it instead wants to return an error after all. I don't see a good
solution either; as far as I'm concerned we should never be building
code that fails if PTP_1588_CLOCK is disabled when it cannot
do anything sensible in that configuration.

I agree that the 'imply' keyword in Kconfig is what made this a
lot worse, and it would be best to replace that with normal
dependencies.

It would be possible to have a ptp_clock_register_optional()
interface in addition to ptp_clock_register(), which could then
be changed to return an error. Some other subsystems follow
this pattern, but it's not any less confusing either.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-12 22:22    [W:0.072 / U:2.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site