Messages in this thread | | | From | Sedat Dilek <> | Date | Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:57:31 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux tooling mailing list |
| |
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:50 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 10:37 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/2/20 10:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > >>> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > >>> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700 > > >>>> linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org > > >>> > > >>> Created. > > >> > > >> I am subscribed, too. > > >> > > >> Will there be a(n)...? > > >> > > >> * archive (for example marc.info) > > > > > > A lore archive would be good? > > > > That has already been requested. > > Hi David, > Thank you for setting up the mailing list. I appreciate it. Now that > the lore archive has been set up > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/), would you mind linking to > it from http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html under archives of > linux-toolchains? >
Updating MAINTAINERS file came to my mind... Dunno where ro place the new ML info?
- Sedat -
> > > > > > > >> * patchwork url > > > > > > We do not have any repositories associated with this list, and there > > > won't be many patches anyway, so patchwork will only be useful as a kind > > > of mail archive. I can ask to set one up though, if people want that? > > Personally, I haven't been using patchwork. I know some maintainers > use it to keep track of reviews of lots of patches, but other than > that is there a major use case for patchwork I'm missing? > > > > > > > > > > Segher > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~Randy > > > > > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
| |