Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] coresight: etm4x: Modify core-commit of cpu to avoid the overflow of HiSilicon ETM | From | Qi Liu <> | Date | Sat, 31 Oct 2020 17:51:56 +0800 |
| |
Hi Suzuki,
On 2020/10/23 18:40, Suzuki Poulose wrote: > On 10/23/20 11:23 AM, Qi Liu wrote: >> The ETM device can't keep up with the core pipeline when cpu core >> is at full speed. This may cause overflow within core and its ETM. >> This is a common phenomenon on ETM devices. >> >> On HiSilicon Hip08 platform, a specific feature is added to set >> core pipeline. So commit rate can be reduced manually to avoid ETM >> overflow. >> >> Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com> >> --- >> Change since v1: >> - add CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE and CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_HISILICON >> to keep specific feature off platforms which don't use it. >> Change since v2: >> - remove some unused variable. >> >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++ >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig >> index c119824..9665d70 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig >> @@ -110,6 +110,24 @@ config CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X >> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the >> module will be called coresight-etm4x. >> >> +config ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE >> + bool "Control overflow impdef support in CoreSight ETM 4.x driver " >> + depends on CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X >> + help >> + This control provides overflow implement define for CoreSight >> + ETM 4.x tracer module which could not reduce commit race >> + automatically, and could avoid overflow within ETM tracer module >> + and its cpu core. >> + >> +config ETM4X_IMPDEF_HISILICON >> + bool "Control overflow impdef support in HiSilicon ETM 4.x driver " >> + depends on ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE >> + help >> + This control provides overflow implement define for HiSilicon >> + ETM 4.x tracer module of Hip08 platform. Overflow within ETM >> + tracer module and its cpu core can be avoided by reducing core >> + commit manually. >> + >> config CORESIGHT_STM >> tristate "CoreSight System Trace Macrocell driver" >> depends on (ARM && !(CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T)) || ARM64 >> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c >> index abd706b..35f4333 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c >> @@ -103,12 +103,61 @@ struct etm4_enable_arg { >> int rc; >> }; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_HISILICON >> + >> +#define HISI_HIP08_CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR 0x3000 >> +#define HISI_HIP08_CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT 12 >> +static void etm4_hisi_config_core_commit(int flag) > > nit: s/int flag/bool enable ? thanks, bool is better to use here, will fix this. > >> +{ >> + u64 val; >> + >> + asm volatile("mrs %0,s3_1_c15_c2_5" : "=r"(val)); >> + val &= ~HISI_HIP08_CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR; >> + val |= flag << HISI_HIP08_CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT; >> + asm volatile("msr s3_1_c15_c2_5,%0" : : "r"(val)); > > Sorry for missing this out. We don't encourage the above encodings > as it will break on legacy toolchain. So, please could you follow what > we do normally, by using sys_reg() macros to define the encoding and use > read/write_sysreg_s() instead. See arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h >
ok, I'll use sys_reg() macro here, and send a new version latter, thanks : ) > >> +} >> +#else >> +static void etm4_hisi_config_core_commit(int flag) >> +{ >> +} >> +#endif /* CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_HISILICON */ >> + >> +static void etm4_enable_arch_specific(void) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * If ETM device is HiSilicon ETM device, reduce the >> + * core-commit to avoid ETM overflow. >> + */ >> + etm4_hisi_config_core_commit(1); >> +} >> + >> +static void etm4_disable_arch_specific(void) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * If ETM device is HiSilicon ETM device, resume the >> + * core-commit after ETM trace is complete. >> + */ >> + etm4_hisi_config_core_commit(0); >> +} >> +#else >> +static void etm4_enable_arch_specific(void) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +static void etm4_disable_arch_specific(void) >> +{ >> +} >> +#endif /* CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE */ >> + >> static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata) >> { >> int i, rc; >> struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config; >> struct device *etm_dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev; >> >> + etm4_enable_arch_specific(); >> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); > > Please could we move the enable_arch_specific() after the CS_UNLOCK ? > That way any potential code could do something with the ETM4x registers. > ok, will fix it. >> >> etm4_os_unlock(drvdata); >> @@ -475,6 +524,7 @@ static void etm4_disable_hw(void *info) >> struct device *etm_dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev; >> int i; >> >> + etm4_disable_arch_specific(); >> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); >> > > Same here > > Suzuki > > . >
| |