lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma coherent memory
Date
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 7:14 PM
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:17:39AM +0000, Andy Duan wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Sent: Wednesday, October
> > 28, 2020 3:07 PM
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:05:28AM +0000, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory
> > > > > to dma coherent memory
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:03:03AM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > > > > > Changes in V5:
> > > > > > 1. Reorganize the vop_mmap function code in patch 1, which is
> > > > > > done by
> > > > > Christoph.
> > > > > > 2. Completely remove the unnecessary code related to reassign
> > > > > > the used ring for card in patch 2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The original vop driver only supports dma coherent device, as
> > > > > > it allocates and maps vring by _get_free_pages and
> > > > > > dma_map_single, but not use dma_sync_single_for_cpu/device to
> > > > > > sync the updates of device_page/vring between EP and RC, which
> > > > > > will cause memory synchronization problem for device don't support
> hardware dma coherent.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And allocate vrings use dma_alloc_coherent is a common way in
> > > > > > kernel, as the memory interacted between two systems should
> > > > > > use consistent memory to avoid caching effects. So here add
> > > > > > noncoherent platform
> > > > > support for vop driver.
> > > > > > Also add some related dma changes to make sure noncoherent
> > > > > > platform works well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sherry Sun (2):
> > > > > > misc: vop: change the way of allocating vrings and device page
> > > > > > misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used ring
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/bus/vop_bus.h | 2 +
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c | 9 ++
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_main.c | 43 ++------
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_debugfs.c | 4 -
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c | 70 +-----------
> > > > > > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_vringh.c | 166 ++++++++++-------------------
> > > > > > include/uapi/linux/mic_common.h | 9 +-
> > > > > > 7 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you all seen:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > > > > 25
> > > > >
> > >
> 2Flore.kernel.org%2Fr%2F8c1443136563de34699d2c084df478181c205db4.16
> > > > >
> > >
> 03854416.git.sudeep.dutt%40intel.com&amp;data=04%7C01%7Csherry.sun%
> > > > >
> > >
> 40nxp.com%7Cc19c987667434969847e08d87b0685e8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> > > > >
> > >
> a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637394615238940323%7CUnknown%7CTW
> > > > >
> > >
> FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX
> > > > >
> > >
> VCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Zq%2FtHWTq%2BuIVBYXFGoeBmq0JJzYd
> > > > > 9zDyv4NVN4TpC%2FU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like this code is asking to just be deleted, is that ok with you?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I saw that patch. I'm ok with it.
> > >
> > > Great, can you please provide a "Reviewed-by:" or "Acked-by:" for it?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Sherry took much effort on the features support on i.MX series like
> i.MX8QM/i.MX8QXP/i.MX8MM.
> >
> > Now it is a pity to delete the vop code.
> >
> > One question,
> > can we resubmit vop code by clean up, now only for i.MX series as Dutt's
> suggestion ?
> > Or we have to drop the design and switch to select other solutions ?
>

Okay, we plan to switch to NTB solution.

> If this whole subsystem is being deleted because it is not used and never shipped,
> yes, please use a different solution.
>
> I don't understand why you were trying to piggy-back on this codebase if the
> hardware was totally different, for some reason I thought this was the same
> hardware. What exactly is this?

Not the whole codebase, just the vop framework.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-28 22:44    [W:1.637 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site